Closed damiengrandi closed 22 hours ago
[!CAUTION]
Review failed
The pull request is closed.
The changes involve a modification to the HttpClient
class in src/HttpClient.ts
, focusing on the handling of HTTP responses. A new line has been added to ensure that the response body is fully consumed before the response
variable is reassigned, enhancing the management of response bodies.
Files | Change Summary |
---|---|
src/HttpClient.ts | Added a line to consume the previous response's body using await response.body.arrayBuffer() before reassigning the response variable. |
HttpClient
class in src/HttpClient.ts
and implements the same change of ensuring the previous response's body is fully consumed before reassigning the response
variable, indicating a strong connection at the code level.In the meadow, where bunnies hop,
A change was made, and we won't stop!
With every byte, we read and play,
Ensuring smooth paths for our day.
So here's to the code, so neat and bright,
A happy dance in the moon's soft light! 🐇✨
[!TIP]
OpenAI O1 model for chat
- We have deployed OpenAI's latest O1 model for chat. - OpenAI claims that this model has superior reasoning capabilities than their GPT-4o model. - Please share any feedback with us in the [discussions post](https://discord.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1283929536186155099).
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
@damiengrandi Thanks a lot!
In rare cases, an uncaught exception can happen with digest auth because of the re-use of the same variable representing the
response
.Demonstration of the issue: Can cause this crash, the exception have not been caught by the
try-catch
block:I fixed the issue by consuming the initial response body before sending a new request:
Another way to fix this could be to use a dedicated variable for each response, but the first response may need to be closed anyway to avoid potential memory issue.
This issue exists in both version 4.2 and 3.22.2 (tested).
Summary by CodeRabbit