Open mschilde opened 1 year ago
@thibaultleouay You authored that change. Could you answer this question?
@mschilde which fields are missing ?
I used that to map the fields
https://developers.strava.com/docs/reference/#api-models-DetailedActivity
Ps : I haven't looked at the Strava api doc for a while and last time I checked it was not the best one
E.g the api returned some fields which were supposed to be already deprecated and removed
@thibaultleouay
Well, lots of fields are missing :-)
I'm talking about this interface: https://github.com/node-strava/node-strava-v3/blob/main/index.d.ts#L243
A call to activities.get
returns lots of data that is not part of the interface. Pretty much everything that is listed in the Strava API docs is returned for a cycling activity.
Some of the missing fields are marked as deprecated in the Strava API docs, e.g. type
, while others are not, e.g. segment_efforts
or device_name
.
Hence my basic questions about the intention of the TS interfaces.
When you make a call to activities.get
you DO end up with an JSON structure that has vastly more attributes than the type describes. Which means that if you currently are using any of the missing fields in your code you have to fight the types in this SDK or cannot upgrade.
I can help with a PR or examples if you like.
@mschilde
Go for a pr 🚀
Agreed. PR welcome.
I have a question regarding the provided TS interfaces. In
v.2.2.0
the DetailedActivityResponse got added.While it's nice to have a non-
any
API response, the interface leaves out a lot of the attributes that the Strava API call (activities.get
) actually returns.What's the idea here? Is this a stub, or are all omitted attributes deprecated by Strava and should not be used?