node-swig / swig-templates

Take a swig of the best template engine for JavaScript.
http://node-swig.github.io/swig-templates/
MIT License
209 stars 29 forks source link

improve package visibility #30

Open cdaringe opened 8 years ago

cdaringe commented 8 years ago

it's hard to find this package! googling it, even with a bunch of keywords, still gets you to paul's original project.

i know paul has demonstrated some reluctance to let go of the reigns. getting his help here would be a big step in realization that the project is alive and kickin'

ecoleman commented 8 years ago

It might be a good idea to change the install instructions on http://node-swig.github.io/swig-templates/ until this is resolved...

nrambeck commented 8 years ago

I thought this project was completely abandoned and was looking for other alternatives until I checked one more time and followed the original repo's fork history. Definitely need to have a better way for people to find this new community project.

cdaringe commented 8 years ago

agreed to both @ecoleman @nrambeck. if either of ya wants to start any effort on the matter, it would be gladly welcomed :)

ecoleman commented 8 years ago

Has anyone talked with Paul? I can reach out to him and check NPM rules for abandoned packages...

kgarsjo commented 8 years ago

For reference, here's the NPM disputes page.

cdaringe commented 8 years ago

we're probably getting ahead of ourselves with that. no, i don't think anyone has reached out recently. the 3-4 of us who have done some continued work in this project haven't gone to great lengths to re-request name rights.

in regards to @ecoleman's remark about updating the docs, great point. filing it as a separate issue, #32

porfidev commented 7 years ago

Well finally im here, so we need create content with swig-templates instead "swig" alone, ill try todo some tutorials :D for SEO tracking

migg24 commented 7 years ago

First thing you should do is make clear that there are no breaking changes in updating from swig 1.4.2 to swig-templates 2.0.2. This is not made clear anywhere, I can only guess this is the case from the small comment in the CHANGELOG.

If this is confirmed you should definitely add this as the first thing on the README to show everybody that they can just switch the package in their dependencies.