Suggestion: Rename the repo from www to something less generic

[andrew]

When forking the repo, if it's called "www" then it's likely to clash with other forks also called "www" and is also kinda hard to search for in a list where there is no description or link to the parent.

[reconbot]

ha, that's something I hadn't thought of

[reconbot]

@voodootikigod Any objections to renaming the repo nodebots.io?

[voodootikigod]

sure but you know you could always just

git clone git@github.com:nodebots/www.git nodebots.io

you know right?

On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Francis Gulotta notifications@github.comwrote:

@voodootikigod https://github.com/voodootikigod Any objections to renaming the repo nodebots.io?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nodebots/www/issues/14#issuecomment-27182264 .

Chris Williams

@voodootikigod http://twitter.com/voodootikigod | GitHubhttp://github.com/voodootikigod

The things I make that you should check out: SaferAging http://www.saferaging.com/ | JSConf http://jsconf.com/ | RobotsConf http://robotsconf.com/ | RobotsWeeklyhttp://robotsweekly.com/

Help me end the negativity on the internet, share thishttp://jsconf.eu/2011/an_end_to_negativity.html .

[andrew]

Yeah, that's what I did. It's more for my list of repos on github: andrew/www doesn't mean anything to anyone without actually clicking through to see what it is.

[voodootikigod]

open to suggestions, what you would recommend?

[andrew]

How about nodebots.io?

[olizilla]

:+1:

[andrew]

:tada: