Closed hackygolucky closed 1 year ago
@hackygolucky This seems like a great idea.
From what I've observed, the #1 need in the CommComm right now is active collaborators. Given that need, I would propose that primary focus should be on recruiting active members.
@hackygolucky What are the steps needed to help enable this? 🤔
good-first-contribution
. good-first-contribution
labels.@hackygolucky Do you think we've made progress on three points at all? I know we've improved 1, but know 2 hasn't really changed much. 🤔
Added "good first issue" to this, since it would probably be helpful if someone who wanted to start helping out on managing it... meta, I know 😅
Happy to help mentor if needed as well.
Bump on this thread ❤️ @bnb, @hackygolucky, think this is still worth pursuing? I know Website Redesign would like to do an educational session of sorts – may be a good candidate as a C+L supplement.
Pinging this again. Discussed in today's CommComm meeting since there's a lack of tests for Code & Learn contributors to contribute ❤️
I think it's certainly still worth doing, and I laid out the firs steps that we should do to start the work and begin to maintain it, but I can't volunteer myself to do that work. This is parking lot/backlog unless someone else can pick it up 😬
I've unarchived this repo so I can close all PRs and issues before re-archiving.
There's been talk over the last year about opening up the Code + Learn program to repos other than Node.js core. The real limitation is people resources–mentors from a repo able to provide clear onboarding/contributing/collaborating guidelines , good-first-pr issues, and availability for reviewing PRs.
Code + Learn helps gain contributors long-term. It would be great to invest in this for our work as well.