Closed mmarchini closed 4 years ago
As a maintainer of node-gyp, depending on a specific version of node-gyp is something I advise against. You should normally use the one that's bundled with node+npm.
Thanks for the feedback @bnoordhuis, I'll probably not merge this then.
Any suggestions on #355? Or is it a situation we just can't handle in code, since it's caused by Ubunut/Debian distributing a non-official Node.js package?
Closing in favor of https://github.com/nodejs/llnode/pull/367
We've detected an issue with your CI configuration that might affect the accuracy of this pull request's coverage report. To ensure accuracy in future PRs, please see these guidelines. A quick fix for this PR: rebase it; your next report should be accurate.
Files with Coverage Reduction | New Missed Lines | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
src/constants.cc | 1 | 80.3% | ||
src/error.h | 1 | 87.5% | ||
src/llv8-constants.cc | 2 | 85.2% | ||
src/llv8.cc | 3 | 71.04% | ||
test/common.js | 7 | 80.08% | ||
src/llnode_api.cc | 8 | 87.5% | ||
src/node-inl.h | 11 | 0.0% | ||
src/node.h | 12 | 20.0% | ||
test/plugin/workqueue-test.js | 13 | 55.17% | ||
src/node.cc | 21 | 37.5% | ||
<!-- | Total: | 215 | --> |
Totals | |
---|---|
Change from base Build 7b9598e9dad0a00e1b7ddd1aabd9cf7dddb3cab4: | 3.8% |
Covered Lines: | 3715 |
Relevant Lines: | 4711 |
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/llnode/issues/355
Signed-off-by: Matheus Marchini mmarchini@netflix.com