search

nodejs / loaders

ECMAScript Modules Loaders
MIT License
126 stars 18 forks source link

Team vs Working Group #5

Open DerekNonGeneric opened 3 years ago

DerekNonGeneric commented 3 years ago

It was never discussed with me (a core member who intends to make significant contributions and maintain the Node.js loader implementation) whether or not this should be a working group or a team. As you can see in the calendar that I made, my intention was to make it an official working group, so I am unsure why this was made into a team.

EDIT: After looking at the repo a bit more, it has become clear to me that it is still very much a WIP.

I assume everything is still up for debate as the members of this team/group are still not listed…

GeoffreyBooth commented 3 years ago

This repo was set up as a fork of the Modules one, and Modules is just a team (not a Working Group). That's the only reason; there was no discussion.

The Modules team at one point discussed becoming a Working Group but decided against it. WGs have more obligations. We could become one if we want to, but I think there's no rush. I don't think there's anything we want to do that we can't do as our current status.