Open ovflowd opened 1 year ago
This issue is open to grabs by anyone interested :)
Hey ! I'm trying to work on this but I got a problem. It's because node doesn't found ts file. So should we build ts before test ?
Hey ! I'm trying to work on this but I got a problem. It's because node doesn't found ts file. So should we build ts before test ?
No. You want to use node --loader=ts-node/esm
Node.js supports custom loaders. (You need to add ts-node as a dev dependency btw)
Or if you also need react compatibility. You might want to use the tsx loader (also a package)
hummm interessing
Have you considered ditching JSDOM + RTL in favor of Cypress/Playwright Component Testing?
Have you considered ditching JSDOM + RTL in favor of Cypress/Playwright Component Testing?
We already have Visual Regression Testing. The only tests we have for Components at the moment are for specific states.
And no, we dont want yet another tool and library and platform. Thank you.
To clarify, our testing of components here is really bare bones, just to certify that for example, a select actually renders said items.
Adding browser testing (even if headless) is overkill for our needs.
So pretty much Node.js itself provides everything we need here with its native test runner; + we only want to unit test utilities, helpers, hooks and certain components that are stateful.
Everything else is already covered by Chromatic + Storybook
@AugustinMauroy are you still working on this?
@araujogui I'm stuck in my pr with the dom. If you want you can commit on my pr it is in "allow edit by maintainer" so in theory you could commit. It's up to you to finish it 😁
@AugustinMauroy can you share the link on PR?
its linked above https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/pull/6129
NEWS:
I would like to contribute (first time to this repo, Hello 👋🏻), but I can't see the PR @AugustinMauroy. Can you share the link so maybe I can run it locally and potentially review it to start familiarising myself with the code?
I didn't make any pr for moment. But you can try on this branch any feedback is welcome
This issue about moving away from Jest to Node.js's Native Test Runner
Why
It would be great if we adopted Node.js's Test Runner (and moved away from Jest) because:
Migration
__mocks__
folders need to be manually imported when used and need to be changed to use the Mocking API https://nodejs.org/api/test.html#mockingjest.
APIs need to be replaced to Node Test Runners APIsexpect
needs to be changed toassert
(https://nodejs.org/api/assert.html)