CI: Orama cloud sync based on environment

[canerakdas]

Description

In the previous PRs opened (#6814, #6806), we ensured that the Orama cloud sync script updates the preview environment on push and pull_request_target events.

With this PR, we aim to update the production indexes using this script on the push event instead of manually updating it and to update the preview environment on pull_request_target events.

Additionally, to prevent these scripts from running twice, we ensure they only run on ubuntu-latest runners. Since we are currently running it on windows-latest in the preview environment, the facets are currently not displayed correctly, likely due to differences in paths on Windows (You can check it in a sample preview build)

Before merging this development, the ORAMA_PRODUCTION_INDEX_ID and ORAMA_PRODUCTION_SECRET_KEY secrets need to be defined. I believe we should get support from @ovflowd or @bmuenzenmeyer for this 👀 I think we should first set these two values to point to the preview environment to ensure everything is working correctly, and then replace them with the production ones

Additionally, it would be helpful to ask the Orama team if indexing on every pull_request_target and push events would cause any issues on their side

Related Issues

Related to #6719

[vercel[bot]]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jun 9, 2024 8:37pm

[ovflowd]

Before merging this development, the ORAMA_PRODUCTION_INDEX_ID and ORAMA_PRODUCTION_SECRET_KEY secrets need to be defined. I believe we should get support from @ovflowd or @bmuenzenmeyer for this 👀 I think we should first set these two values to point to the preview environment to ensure everything is working correctly, and then replace them with the production ones

Secrets Added 🖖

[ovflowd]

Additionally, it would be helpful to ask the Orama team if indexing on every pull_request_target and push events would cause any issues on their side

cc @micheleriva

[micheleriva]

@ovflowd that looks good to me!

[bmuenzenmeyer]

hmm - comparing experiences, the proposed search has odd headers

[ovflowd]

Not sue why the discrepancies, this PR doesn't affect the website at all...

[canerakdas]

hmm - comparing experiences, the proposed search has odd headers

As far as I understand; the current script works for windows-latest and ubuntu-latest. However, since windows-latest runs later and the paths in the file located at this path come as shown in the image below;

The split in this line does not work correctly. Therefore, the script that runs later overwrites the index created in ubuntu-latest, corrupting the existing indexes

Since we will only run this script on ubuntu-latest, I think there won't be such an issue after merging this PR. Since the current production secrets are replaced with the preview ones, it would be beneficial to run pull_request_target event in a different PR after this PR is merged and recheck the preview to ensure everything is working correctly 👀

[bmuenzenmeyer]

Good analysis @canerakdas - I'm willing to get it a go today if we're all around to watch

[github-actions[bot]]

Lighthouse Results URL	Performance	Accessibility	Best Practices	SEO	Report
/en	🟠 87	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 91	🔗
/en/about	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 96	🟢 91	🔗
/en/about/previous-releases	🟢 96	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 92	🔗
/en/download	🟢 99	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 91	🔗
/en/blog	🟢 99	🟢 100	🟢 96	🟢 92	🔗

[github-actions[bot]]

Unit Test Coverage Report

Lines	Statements	Branches	Functions
	90.67% (593/654)	76.08% (175/230)	94.57% (122/129)

Unit Test Report

Tests	Skipped	Failures	Errors	Time
131	0 :zzz:	0 :x:	0 :fire:	5.244s :stopwatch: