nodejs / open-standards

Node.js Open Standards Team
43 stars 8 forks source link

Idea: Open Standards Session at Collaborator Summit in May #18

Closed jorydotcom closed 5 years ago

jorydotcom commented 5 years ago

Hey all, @mcollina & I just had this thought that we should grab session time to discuss the OpenJS Foundation's standards work across Node and JSF projects. We can talk about how the JSF managed this in the past, what we did, and the Node projects efforts/interests in this area.

I'd be happy to co-host this session - anyone interested?

related: link to cfp form

mhdawson commented 5 years ago

Sounds good to me.

MylesBorins commented 5 years ago

Very interested

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019, 1:44 PM Michael Dawson notifications@github.com wrote:

Sounds good to me.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nodejs/open-standards/issues/18#issuecomment-479114916, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecV3qT8MaGTLYe8sF0OQKjkXtxfJ4Sks5vc5bsgaJpZM4cYvAQ .

benjamingr commented 5 years ago

Also would love to hear this

jorydotcom commented 5 years ago

Groovy - I can take care of submitting the form, does anyone want to co-host?

jorydotcom commented 5 years ago

FYI I submitted a session proposal for this!

littledan commented 5 years ago

I'm wondering, what if we had two sessions: One high-level one with the agenda that @jorydotcom described above, and a separate one to review TC39 proposals? Would folks be interested in the second one? If so, I'd be happy to run it.

MylesBorins commented 5 years ago

I would be interested in both

On May 14, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Daniel Ehrenberg notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm wondering, what if we had two sessions: One high-level one with the agenda that @jorydotcom https://github.com/jorydotcom described above, and a separate one to review TC39 proposals? Would folks be interested in the second one? If so, I'd be happy to run it.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nodejs/open-standards/issues/18?email_source=notifications&email_token=AADZYVZH64BVIINYIW7ZCNLPVLRWVA5CNFSM4HDC6AIKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODVMA2HQ#issuecomment-492309790, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADZYV2A47NMISQDHQYW3BDPVLRWVANCNFSM4HDC6AIA.

mcollina commented 5 years ago

+1

Il giorno mar 14 mag 2019 alle ore 18:51 Myles Borins < notifications@github.com> ha scritto:

I would be interested in both

On May 14, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Daniel Ehrenberg notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm wondering, what if we had two sessions: One high-level one with the agenda that @jorydotcom https://github.com/jorydotcom described above, and a separate one to review TC39 proposals? Would folks be interested in the second one? If so, I'd be happy to run it.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/nodejs/open-standards/issues/18?email_source=notifications&email_token=AADZYVZH64BVIINYIW7ZCNLPVLRWVA5CNFSM4HDC6AIKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODVMA2HQ#issuecomment-492309790>, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADZYV2A47NMISQDHQYW3BDPVLRWVANCNFSM4HDC6AIA .

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/nodejs/open-standards/issues/18?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAAMXY3KUI3UNQZEJKBGBD3PVLUXVA5CNFSM4HDC6AIKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODVMDDGQ#issuecomment-492319130, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMXY7ISBQ5DWW5LC4MC53PVLUXVANCNFSM4HDC6AIA .

benjamingr commented 5 years ago

@littledan I'd love to attend

littledan commented 5 years ago

Great; I have submitted a proposal for this.

jorydotcom commented 5 years ago

+1! thanks @littledan !

tniessen commented 5 years ago

I believe this can be closed, feel free to reopen if you disagree.