Closed tsctx closed 3 months ago
@mcollina there are many such cases, should they be fixed?
I think there's still some questions left to answer here. Mostly: is this something we need? If not (and I am assuming we don't), what benefit is there in adding it?
is this something we need? If not (and I am assuming we don't), what benefit is there in adding it?
I also have my doubts. but, double cloning can be avoided, as in the commit just added.
In fact, it is not skipping the spec, but creating a new arraybuffer at safeBufferConcat
according to this, which should not be a violation of the spec.
Hmm... If I was to say it, It is completely fix #3337, but we may not need to worry about pooled buffer.
completely fix #3337