codecov[bot]
commented
7 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 97.58%. Comparing base (
41b0bd2) to head (7509dc7).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## 0.12 #283 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 97.48% 97.58% +0.09% ========================================== Files 139 139 Lines 4568 4588 +20 ========================================== + Hits 4453 4477 +24 + Misses 115 111 -4 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/283/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [3.10-macos-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/283/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.58% <100.00%> (+0.09%)` | :arrow_up: | | [3.10-ubuntu-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/283/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.58% <100.00%> (+0.09%)` | :arrow_up: | | [3.10-windows-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/283/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.52% <100.00%> (+0.10%)` | :arrow_up: | | [3.11-macos-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/283/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.58% <100.00%> (+0.09%)` | :arrow_up: | | [3.11-ubuntu-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/283/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.58% <100.00%> (+0.09%)` | :arrow_up: | | [3.11-windows-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/283/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.52% <100.00%> (+0.10%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
There are two issues with schema introspection. Specifically:
If you have a switch statement that provides completely different set of interpretations per-branch, then it will merge the schemas together. This is in appropriate because each branch provides a different part of the schema that should be isolated and only merged together once complete. This PR prevents this from occurring.
If you attempt to define a relationship interpretation before defining the source node, it will not be bound to the source node type.
Fix a syntax issue in the graphql schema.