codecov[bot]
commented
4 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 97.70%. Comparing base (
3972666) to head (6eb8e6b).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #296 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.69% 97.70% ======================================= Files 139 139 Lines 4644 4654 +10 ======================================= + Hits 4537 4547 +10 Misses 107 107 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/296/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [3.10-macos-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/296/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.70% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [3.10-ubuntu-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/296/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.70% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [3.10-windows-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/296/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.65% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [3.11-macos-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/296/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.70% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [3.11-ubuntu-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/296/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.70% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [3.11-windows-latest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nodestream-proj/nodestream/pull/296/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj) | `97.65% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nodestream-proj#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The test cases describe this feature better than words. Essentially this allows a user to opt into leaving a value delayed until the consuming component wants the value resolved (or re-resolved).