nodevel / harbour-defender

Defender is a privacy guard for SailfishOS
2 stars 8 forks source link

License missing #10

Closed rinigus closed 2 years ago

rinigus commented 2 years ago

I would like to help to get Defender into Chum. It would require some small work on build scripts to make it possible to build at OBS, but I don't expect it to be anything major and would be happy to make the changes.

However, I noticed that Defender is missing a license. The only reference to any kind of license is to BSD at https://github.com/nodevel/harbour-defender/blob/master/src/harbour-defender.cpp#L6 . I presume it was just generated by SFOS SDK, so it cannot be really used as a reference of your intent.

Please either add a license or let me know your preference. I can add it to the set of commits together with build scripts changes. I was thinking to submit my changes to @peterleinchen fork as it looks to be a location where the current development is done. However, I presume you both would have to agree on license anyway.

@peterleinchen, would you mind to open issues in your fork too?

peterleinchen commented 2 years ago

Hey rinigus,

I am not that active at the moment. So, sorry for the delay. I would be glad if you could help getting defender into chum! :)

I will try to open issues at github...should be done!

I never heard anything from nodevel. And I did not take a look at all regarding license(s).

Maybe GPL v3 (or any you like better BSD, MIT,...). I am open minded.

And yes, we should see github.com/peterleinchen/harbour-defender as the current repo.

All the best PL

On Saturday, 8 January 2022, rinigus wrote:

I would like to help to get Defender into Chum. It would require some small work on build scripts to make it possible to build at OBS, but I don't expect it to be anything major and would be happy to make the changes.

However, I noticed that Defender is missing a license. The only reference to any kind of license is to BSD at https://github.com/nodevel/harbour-defender/blob/master/src/harbour-defender.cpp#L6 . I presume it was just generated by SFOS SDK, so it cannot be really used as a reference of your intent.

Please either add a license or let me know your preference. I can add it to the set of commits together with build scripts changes. I was thinking to submit my changes to @peterleinchen fork as it looks to be a location where the current development is done. However, I presume you both would have to agree on license anyway.

@peterleinchen, would you mind to open issues in your fork too?

-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/nodevel/harbour-defender/issues/10 You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Message ID: @.***

-- Peter Leinchen

Sent from my mobile device

rinigus commented 2 years ago

No problem with not being active, I'll be happy to contribute and get it to Chum. Assuming that you can set open source license. GPLv3 is fine by me, but I am just a user. So, if you think it is OK, let's go for it.

I will close it over here and we can continue at your repo.