Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Regarding your second point, it would also be good to be able to order the
verses in
each topic by things like Bible order (and maybe add a number field for
'relevance'
which could also be sorted by??).
However you want to do the reordering of topics, please don't make it so that
you can
no longer change topics to subtopics though...
Original comment by c.morga...@gmail.com
on 6 May 2009 at 9:12
Yes, verses should be able to be ordered by Bible order. At a minimum, they
should
support marking or starring particular verses and ordering or filtering by
that. I
doubt that a numeric relevance will add much more and I'm not sure how much
intrinsic
meaning it would have. If you came back to it two months later, I can't think
of any
way to know why this one was a four and that one was a five, while marking can
be
easily done and hopefully has a much more logical meaning (and is supported by
other
applications such as Gmail and Thunderbird).
Original comment by jonmmor...@gmail.com
on 7 May 2009 at 12:54
After thinking further about this, I come to the conclusion that relevance *is*
important. Starring probably should be supported to mark things for a
particular
purpose, but it is possibly much more temporary, whereas a relevance judgement
is a
fairly permanent indication of whether a passage is critical to the discussion
of a
topic or whether it is just an idea that may or may not be relevant to the
topic.
However, it doesn't really make sense for it to be numerical. I would suggest
a few
names to give the level of relevance, defaulting to "Relevant" (something like
"Maybe
Relevant", "Somewhat Relevant", and "Relevant", though what they mean will
depend on
the person who is doing the categorisation and I suspect inter-annotator
agreement
will be quite low). This is fine for individual notes, but will possibly need
some
changes if we ever support sharing.
Original comment by jonmmor...@gmail.com
on 30 May 2009 at 7:59
I was thinking of numbers as just being a shorter way to indicate the relevance
- you
could easily have a key somewhere, and numbers take less space and could
indicate
more levels more easily. Not really that fussed though...
Original comment by c.morga...@gmail.com
on 30 May 2009 at 8:05
Hi Chris, Ben and Jonathan
Manage Topics frame
This morning I was creating topics for Bible verses in BPBible 0.4.5.1
after I added some topics I decided to change them and add new themes and move
fragments from one topic to another and got an error. After doing that I was
not able
to use BPBible and needed to kill BPBible process in Task Manager. So I decided
to
change language from Lithuanian to English and try to do this once again.
Problem was
less severe just was informed that there was a problem and I need to look at
error.log file but it was still possible to work with the BPBible.
P.S. I already sent Lithuanian translation to translations@bpbible.com on date Tue,
Feb 16, 2010 at 4:11 AM may you check maybe there is an error in my translation
messages.mo file because with Lithuanian interface BPBible just hangs up if I
delete
fragment from the topics. Also I am sending attached archived error.log and
bpbible.exe.log to you.
Thanks for BPBible
Original comment by vidas...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2010 at 6:01
Attachments:
Hi Vidmantas,
This problem has nothing to do with the Lithuanian translation. I have seen it
occasionally, but have never been able to reproduce it or find what is causing
it.
However, once it has failed it will unfortunately continue to fail and as you
say
requires Task Manager to kill it.
The second message "Errors have occurred" is a known problem which will be
fixed in
0.4.6. I have just raised Issue 124 to cover it.
Thanks for the report.
Original comment by jonmmor...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2010 at 11:01
Issue 163 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by jonmmor...@gmail.com
on 1 Jul 2010 at 2:28
While it would be nice to have all of these issues fixed for 0.5, they are not
critical to the 0.5 goals and so some of them may be deferred to after 0.5.
Original comment by jonmmor...@gmail.com
on 17 Jul 2010 at 8:01
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jonmmor...@gmail.com
on 5 May 2009 at 11:57