Closed gappc closed 1 year ago
@gappc yes, i agree. It is a level of complexity we should avoid.
I agree too!
I agree too.
@gappc shall we put this iteration in the next iteration?
@sseppi yes, but lets first take a look at the current planning in tomorrows meeting.
@gappc OK, I've put the issue in the backlog. Tomorrow we will decide which in which Milestone we will introduce this issue
@sseppi lerna was removed as of b84c3d2743cffd7a5048b3b2df9186ae288c6c98. I think we can close this issue.
@gappc thank you!
At the moment we use lerna to handle the mono repository, but in reality it is not useful for the project in its current state and only a source of confusion and problems. I'd opt to remove lerna and the base
package.json
andpackage-lock.json
files for simplification. At the same time, the docs must be updated.@sseppi, @mrabans, @MatteoBiasi: what is your opinion?