nolenfelten / xbmc-addons

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/xbmc-addons
0 stars 0 forks source link

Brainstorm for utils.py #48

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Hi guys.

I want to start this session for more common and advanced utils.py
creation. I saw lots of utils.py on plug-ins. Maybe we can share our
thoughts,ideas and bring together of all handy codes together for 1
universal utils.py

Examples:
Nuka's utils.py :
http://code.google.com/p/xbmc-addons/source/browse/trunk/plugins/video/Apple%20M
ovie%20Trailers%20Lite/resources/lib/utils.py
One from my plugin :
http://code.google.com/p/queeup/source/browse/branches/plugins/video/Video%20Cop
ilot/resources/lib/utils.py

Take care..
queeup

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Ozgur.BASKIN@gmail.com on 21 Feb 2010 at 5:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Good idea in my opinion. 
One requirement I would like us to thing about is where we would store this 
file.
Will we have to copy it over and over in every plugin ? how do we handle the 
updates
of this file? ...
To address those point I think the file should be released as an xbmc-addons 
python
library. But I don't know how this could be managed. 

Original comment by wattaz...@gmail.com on 21 Feb 2010 at 6:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Queep, please move this discussion to the forum, link to the tread and close 
this 
ticket.  Issue trackers are fine for discussing the technical specifics of new 
features, but high level talks like this really belong somewhere else.

Thanks.

Original comment by rwparris2 on 21 Feb 2010 at 6:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
IMO looking at both the examples is that the stuff should either be wrapped up 
already 
in xbmc python module or it is plugin/script specific.

I might be missing the point of this but I really don't see the need for it :)
Removing me. Also abit offtopic perhaps but cc everyone, to me it feels abit 
rude as 
those interested will add themself or you cc those that have been asked to be 
it, but I 
don't know how its usually done here so I'm not gonna interfere with it :).

Original comment by Tobias.A...@gmail.com on 21 Feb 2010 at 6:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by gerke...@gmail.com on 21 Feb 2010 at 6:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Tobias raises a good point, so all cc's other than those who've already 
responded have 
been removed.
Closed as invalid, but anyone may feel free to make a thread in the forum if 
you want 
to discuss further.

Original comment by rwparris2 on 21 Feb 2010 at 6:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I'm so sorry about Cc guys. I did not want to be rude.

Ok I'm moving this discussion to the plugin development forum.

Original comment by Ozgur.BASKIN@gmail.com on 21 Feb 2010 at 7:53