Closed fatboystring closed 12 years ago
Thanks Dan, and really good to speak to you earlier. Your help with this is really appreciated. If you feel up to looking at a longer term solution when you have time, that'd be great. Beers on us next time you pop over of a Friday evening.
L.
-----Original Message----- From: fatboystring [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Sent: 09 May 2012 23:08 To: github Subject: [Accessible-Media-Player] Accessible Media Player - Destroy method (#8)
Hi Guys,
I was speaking to Hans Hillen the other night. He had come up against an issue that warranted the inclusion of a destroy() method on the Media Player. I have added this into the player and tightened up a few of the timer methods. This seems to solve the issue for the time being. However, I think there is a more elegant solution to the problem. I do not have the time to do this right now but will get the chance in a week or so. It's up to you if you want to merge this pull request, or leave it for the time being.
Feel free to comment if you so desire :)
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/fatboystring/Accessible-Media-Player master
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/nomensa/Accessible-Media-Player/pull/8
-- Commit Summary --
-- File Changes --
M core/javascript/jquery.player.js (38) M core/javascript/jquery.player.min.js (14) M custom/javascript/config/jwplayer-5/jw-player.config.js (5) M custom/javascript/config/jwplayer-5/jw-player.config.min.js (3)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/nomensa/Accessible-Media-Player/pull/8.patch https://github.com/nomensa/Accessible-Media-Player/pull/8.diff
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/nomensa/Accessible-Media-Player/pull/8
Cheers Dan, we've merged these changes back into the player now.
Thanks, Em
Hi Guys,
I was speaking to Hans Hillen the other night. He had come up against an issue that warranted the inclusion of a destroy() method on the Media Player. I have added this into the player and tightened up a few of the timer methods. This seems to solve the issue for the time being. However, I think there is a more elegant solution to the problem. I do not have the time to do this right now but will get the chance in a week or so. It's up to you if you want to merge this pull request, or leave it for the time being.
Feel free to comment if you so desire :)