search

nomicness / a-whole-new-world

2 stars 7 forks source link

326 Amendment to 112 #41

Closed thematrimix closed 8 years ago

jimmyhmiller commented 8 years ago

You say you are amending 112. But your diff doesn't show that.

thematrimix commented 8 years ago

Sry for my lack how the rules system works. How should I make it so that I amending rule 112. Shall, I remove the rule? If so I need to update my rule as there are parts of rule 112 that I do not want to amend.

ArchmageInc commented 8 years ago

Also, for the purposes of automation, the players.yaml file must have an entry for the active player.

ArchmageInc commented 8 years ago

this is a test comment

ArchmageInc commented 8 years ago

I will have to vote against this, only because forcing a vote on players becoming active, even if they only want to observe, or vote creates a barrier to entry that I would like to avoid. I know this rule allows them the opportunity to propose a rule change and be immediately accepted, but I would still like to keep a lower barrier to entry.

ArchmageInc commented 8 years ago

nay

jimmyhmiller commented 8 years ago

nay

ArchmageInc commented 8 years ago

/open

nomic-bot commented 8 years ago

@ArchmageInc, you cannot open an issue which you did not create.

dilbertKocik commented 8 years ago

nay

dilbertKocik commented 8 years ago

/roll 2d6+1

nomic-bot commented 8 years ago

@dilbert88 requested I roll 2d6 and add 1 to the total.

Below are the results:

| 9 |

rythompson commented 8 years ago

nay

rythompson commented 8 years ago

/roll 2d6+1

nomic-bot commented 8 years ago

@rythompson requested I roll 2d6 and add 1 to the total.

Below are the results:

| 9 |

ArchmageInc commented 8 years ago

/roll 2d6+1

nomic-bot commented 8 years ago

@ArchmageInc requested I roll 2d6 and add 1 to the total.

Below are the results:

| 8 |

jimmyhmiller commented 8 years ago

This should probably be closed.