Open nonrnp opened 2 years ago
The reference is meant to be used by various commands. However, for the sake of not repeating this MainParser
diagram, we decided to use a more general reference description so that other commands are able to leverage the use of this diagram. This can be seen in Detailed Edit Contact Parsing
under the Editing a contact section.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: In such case, then the reference fields should be written as Detailed Parsing
in all diagram instead, whereas the specific parser type can be put as a description outside the diagram. In this case, such method is not used which make the diagrams confusing to the reader as the result. Considering this, I disagree with the rejected
response from the developers.
The reference label from
MainParser
sequence diagram is different from the one shown below, which makes it confusing whether if it is the continuation from the first diagram.