Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
[ContentPipeline]
Original comment by lav...@gmail.com
on 25 Apr 2009 at 12:45
The stubs have been created
Have started work on the MonoDevelop addin
Original comment by lav...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2009 at 9:11
OpaqueDataDictionary and NamedValueDictionary classes implemented
Original comment by raxxla...@gmail.com
on 1 Dec 2009 at 4:01
Attachments:
First off, thanks for you contribution. In order for the code to be accepted you
should write some simple NUnit tests for them as well. When you have done this
create
a new issue and supply the patch.
Sorry to make you do additional work, but we need to write the tests for new
code, or
else it will never be done.
If you need help on how to write the tests just logon to out IRC channel and I
will
try to assist.
Original comment by lav...@gmail.com
on 1 Dec 2009 at 7:17
it is ok. i just never writing unit tests for the code like "hello world". I
will
provide unit tests with next contribute.
Original comment by raxxla...@gmail.com
on 1 Dec 2009 at 7:32
i haven't either until now ;) the tests in MonoXNA seem to have been written to
ensure proper results despite code changes...
Original comment by lav...@gmail.com
on 1 Dec 2009 at 7:49
These are the current patches needed in MonoDevelop to allow for our MonoXNA
addin.
The patches should be applied in the respective assemblies.
Original comment by lav...@gmail.com
on 24 Jan 2010 at 5:00
Attachments:
The patches where not accepted (at least not without some modifications). The
changes
in the patches are part of the core project model, and they are reluctant to
change
it if they don't have to. In addition the fix I made for alternative filename
extensions had an issue that I hadn't considered as important that it in fact
is.
Lluis made a less intrusive change in the project model instead that might
solve the
problem. I'm currently testing it, but some issues have already been found.
Original comment by lav...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2010 at 11:55
I misunderstood the reply by lluis. He only objected to the changes made to
allow for
invisible solution items, the changes made to allow alternate extensions where
ok,
except for one issue which I must solve before the patch is accepted.
I'll post the new patch when I'm finished
Original comment by lav...@gmail.com
on 2 Feb 2010 at 4:10
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
lav...@gmail.com
on 25 Apr 2009 at 12:35