codecov[bot]
commented
11 months ago Codecov Report
Patch and project coverage have no change.
Comparison is base (
049fb00) 82.80% compared to head (c0fc7c0) 82.80%. Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #635 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 82.80% 82.80% ======================================= Files 105 105 Lines 12815 12815 ======================================= Hits 10612 10612 Misses 2203 2203 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/noqdev/iambic/pull/635/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [functional_tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/noqdev/iambic/pull/635/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev) | `64.17% <ø> (-0.18%)` | :arrow_down: | | [functional_tests_config_discovery](https://app.codecov.io/gh/noqdev/iambic/pull/635/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev) | `45.34% <ø> (+0.16%)` | :arrow_up: | | [unit_tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/noqdev/iambic/pull/635/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev) | `72.83% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. [see 2 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/noqdev/iambic/pull/635/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
What changed?
Rationale
How was it tested?
If it was manually verified, list the instructions for your reviewers to follow.