The indicated column / row is incorrect. The column is curiously similar to the one reported in sector 11. Based on TPF's header (1CRV4P, 2CRV4P), the (column, row) is (114, 101)
the per-pixel plot seems to be very different from the actual per-pixel flux values. I don't know if it is a feature, the intended result of the LATTE-specific processing, or it is a bug.
Sector 38 per-pixel plot from LATTE:
Now compare it with the similar per-pixel plot produced by lightkurve:
it looks very different from LATTE output.
the per-pixel lightcurve is processed with a 5-sigma clipping of outliers, the default in lightkurve. I also plotted the flux as-is, without any processing, it looks similar.
I also inspect some pixels independently. It appears that the plot from lightkurve reflects the actual flux.
I initially ran into the problem in LATTE-dev branch dated Oct 2020 (commit 5eea005668f67b1e98e554c557119508c8e92805), but is reproduced in the latest master.
I ran LATTE for the following TIC, and believe there are some issues with per-pixel plot output.
For sector 38 per-pixel plot,
1CRV4P,2CRV4P), the (column, row) is (114, 101)Sector 38 per-pixel plot from LATTE:
Now compare it with the similar per-pixel plot produced by lightkurve:
lightkurve. I also plotted the flux as-is, without any processing, it looks similar.I initially ran into the problem in
LATTE-devbranch dated Oct 2020 (commit 5eea005668f67b1e98e554c557119508c8e92805), but is reproduced in the latestmaster.