Open n-peugnet opened 3 years ago
Hi Nicolas, I just saw that issue. Interesting idea. It would require splitting the package (documentation files, library/headers, etc etc). Surely possible, but what is the gain?
Why do you prefer a version without webengine?
I very much prefer the viewer panel to match my system theme, and the nowebengine does this perfectly. Also, as the content of an RSS feed is usually primarily informative, I don't really care if some of the content (like images) is not displayed properly. If I want to read the article as it was intended to be seen, I open it in my web browser.
So I don't need the Web engine in the RSS reader, the app without it better matches my system theme which is perfect and as this version of the app is maintained upstream I hope that it won't be to much of a burden to maintain. All these reasons makes me think that it can be interesting to add this version to Debian.
USE_WEBENGINNE=true
USE_WEBENGINE=false
I know at least of one other similar case in Debian which is qbittorrent
. For this program, there is also a package for the qbittorrent-nox
version which is maintained upstream. This might be an example to follow.
Also, as a lot of the dependencies are stripped, this makes for a much more lightweight install (almost twice as light according to the appimage releases)
Hi, thank you for packaging rssguard for debian.
I am new to the debian workflow so i'm not sure if I should have done an RFP for this, but I was wondering if you could also build the
nowebengine
version of RSSGuard with this source package.Here is how archlinux did it, it seems like it is just a matter of setting the
USE_WEBENGINE=false
env var.