Open mitya57 opened 8 years ago
Needed to apply this to the Fedora python-nose package to get it to pass tests with converage 4.2, so +1 here.
Nose is unmaintained. Unless someone else takes over maintainership, it's not going to happen. Sorry.
Is nose2
planned to replace nose
? In other words, is it worth for a new maintainer to adopt nose
, or should we instead turn our attention to nose2
?
In case of the latter, then a note could be added to the README of nose
, in order to point people to nose2
.
There is a note on the main page of the docs: http://nose.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Yes, I think you should be looking at Nose 2. It's not compatible with Nose 1.x though. Make sure to read the caveats.
Also, the README is auto-generated. If you put together a proper patch to document that fact, then I'll merge it.
Thanks for the information. I'll try to create a patch for the code that generates the README.
According to the Coverage.py 4.1 changelog:
Coverage.report
function had two parameters with non-None defaults, which have been changed.show_missing
used to default to True, but now defaults to None. If you had been callingCoverage.report
without specifyingshow_missing
, you'll need to explicitly set it to True to keep the same behavior.Without that option, four tests in nose fail:
The example of the failure can be seen in https://bugs.debian.org/828224.