Closed MerryOscar closed 1 month ago
It would be nice to find a #
equivalent for geohashes. Then people could cite them in the text, a parser could turn them into a name and a link for a feed of that location could be created.
I'll merge this soon unless there are objections.
Go on. I will update the comment NIP accordingly.
How do we link i
tag and k
tag when multiple i
tags of different types exist? Or do you think that these links are unnecessary?
I don't think you would need to explicitly link them, since k
tags will always be prefixes of i
tags (if I understand correctly).
I think it is safer to specify and avoid misunderstandings.
What do you suggest? I don't see any ambiguity.
What do you suggest?
Just keep the table with the k
values to make the guidance absolutely clear.
Oh, ok, I thought you were suggesting a change, you're saying keep it as is?
you're saying keep it as is?
Yep, I really like how clear it is.
Following on from the discussion around adding a Generic Comment NIP - this PR adds the extensions to the
i
tags that are supported in the Generic Comment kind1111
.This PR is optional depending on whether the list of supported external content ids should be in it's own NIP or part of the Generic Comment NIP.