Closed kyle-long closed 7 years ago
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #97 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 100% 100%
=======================================
Files 63 72 +9
Lines 1837 1985 +148
=======================================
+ Hits 1837 1985 +148
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
shelf/artifact_manager.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:white_check_mark: |
shelf/hook/container.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
shelf/hook/background/container.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
shelf/hook/manager.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
shelf/metadata/container.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:white_check_mark: |
shelf/metadata/manager.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:white_check_mark: |
shelf/hook/event.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
shelf/hook/null_manager.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
shelf/hook/background/command_runner.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
shelf/utils.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:white_check_mark: |
... and 14 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c29d2c0...ac39955. Read the comment docs.
Actually I already found a problem. It appears it is identifying the scheme as "http" instead of "https" for some reason when using https.
Need to look into why this might be the case
Update: You can disregard this comment. I forgot our test environment is doing ssl termination.
ac39955869131e263aff9d20714c208b0ec4d591
Code review fixes
I took many shortcuts in preperation for the rewrite we think will be coming.