Closed iamsamirzon closed 2 years ago
Self-assigned this issue to @shizhMSFT.
@iamsamirzon @SteveLasker Do we have an example specificiation / guide so that I can follow?
@iamsamirzon The problem with this issue as well as 41 is that is too generic and doesn't demonstrate specific user value. notation has many sub-commands and we know many of them are not necessarily in scope for improvement/enhancement in even RC-1.
My suggestion would be to close issues like this out and just migrate over the user stories we have in the notation repository to track.
@dtzar - I am ok with closing this one as we discussed in the 8/1/2022 Notary V2 meeting. As for https://github.com/notaryproject/roadmap/issues/41 , I think we can repurpose it and convert this into a user story/CLI command specification and implementation for the "Notation verify".
Summary User/Implementers Guide Intended Outcome There should be a specification to help implementers understand the architecture of the CLI engine for continuing to maintain and extend it. Additional context Linked Issue : https://github.com/notaryproject/notation/issues/88