search

notaryproject / roadmap

Roadmap for Notary Project
7 stars 6 forks source link

Local storage of Signatures #46

Open iamsamirzon opened 2 years ago

iamsamirzon commented 2 years ago

Summary The CLI will need access to a local storage Intended Outcome Notation CLI implementations allows for this use case The specfication PR is merged Additional context Will update based on finalized design/spec in prior version of alpha release The implementation work is in https://github.com/notaryproject/roadmap/issues/46 Specification work will be in https://github.com/notaryproject/roadmap/issues/43

iamsamirzon commented 2 years ago

This is an optimization that we can defer to a RC-2 or later

iamsamirzon commented 2 years ago

Lets talk to @shizhMSFT about this before deciding if this is needed for RC-1

gokarnm commented 2 years ago
iamsamirzon commented 2 years ago

The implementation work is in https://github.com/notaryproject/roadmap/issues/46 Specification work will be in https://github.com/notaryproject/roadmap/issues/43

dtzar commented 2 years ago

Closing as duplicate of https://github.com/notaryproject/roadmap/issues/15

iamsamirzon commented 2 years ago

@dtzar - I disagree. This item is not a duplicate of #15. They are related, as #15 may require the capability identified in this item, but the capability itself can be used even in "remote signing" ( aka signing an image that is already present in an OCI repository)

Lets talk to @shizhMSFT if he sees a use case for defining and implementing local storage of signatures outside of "local signing" ( aka #15)

dtzar commented 2 years ago

Ah, I see sorry. Makes sense "local storage of a signature" versus "local signing" if we think there is enough difference which might need to be implemented. I feel like "local storage of a signature" was just a natural thing which needed to happen for "local signing".