Open old-mikser opened 4 years ago
Hi @7evenmikser ! RandomX can not be implemented in a webminer because of technical reasons (missing features in rounding modes in webassembly). I have to analyze the source code of bittube to see if we can implement bittube.
@notgiven688 thanks and also TURTLECOIN is profitable for this moment,i hope you can implement it.
any update on this?
For the moment bittube is the most profitablem, we hope you can implement it
Hello, I have 3 questions.
First one - is there bittube support or will it be added? As I understood from this issue - https://github.com/notgiven688/webminerpool/issues/120 it's done by @PiTi2k5 but I don't see it in the webminerpool branches.
Also, as I can see coins are slowly moving to RandomX variations, such as: RandomSFX (RandomX variant for Safex). RandomV (RandomX variant for new MoneroV). RandomARQ (RandomX variant for ArQmA) Considering you told in https://github.com/notgiven688/webminerpool/issues/126 web mining gonna die if most of coins finally will move to different variants of randomx? may I know how big (in %%) "significant performance loss" is?
And finally - what about cn/gpu support?
Many thanks!