Closed dscorbett closed 1 year ago
NotoSansBalinese-Regular.otf
Site: https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/blob/9b479a1e7c843da5ea247530a8578f288b49f870/unhinted/otf/NotoSansBalinese/NotoSansBalinese-Regular.otf Date: 2022-03-05
Version 2.002
Noto Sans Balinese has an unused glyph, _244. It looks like it was designed for <U+1B44, U+1B2B, U+1B38>. Is its omission intentional?
_244
ᬭ᭄ᬫᬸ U+1B2D BALINESE LETTER RA U+1B44 BALINESE ADEG ADEG U+1B2B BALINESE LETTER MA U+1B38 BALINESE VOWEL SIGN SUKU
With the unused glyph, for comparison:
Font
NotoSansBalinese-Regular.otf
Where the font came from, and when
Site: https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/blob/9b479a1e7c843da5ea247530a8578f288b49f870/unhinted/otf/NotoSansBalinese/NotoSansBalinese-Regular.otf Date: 2022-03-05
Font version
Version 2.002
Issue
Noto Sans Balinese has an unused glyph,
_244. It looks like it was designed for <U+1B44, U+1B2B, U+1B38>. Is its omission intentional?Character data
ᬭ᭄ᬫᬸ U+1B2D BALINESE LETTER RA U+1B44 BALINESE ADEG ADEG U+1B2B BALINESE LETTER MA U+1B38 BALINESE VOWEL SIGN SUKU
Screenshots