search

notofonts / duployan

Noto Duployan
SIL Open Font License 1.1
3 stars 1 forks source link

Two fonts in wrong directory? #8

Closed BPickle closed 7 months ago

BPickle commented 8 months ago

NotoSansDuployan/hinted/otf/NotoSansDuployan-Bold.otf NotoSansDuployan/hinted/otf/NotoSansDuployan-Regular.otf

Shouldn't these two fonts be in a /full/otf/ folder? I think these may be the only two OTF fonts that are in a hinted folder instead of a full folder.

berrymot commented 7 months ago

shouldn't there also be s full/ttf ?

BPickle commented 7 months ago

Maybe there should be a full/ttf directory too. But this was the only instance I found where fonts were in a spot that for sure seemed incorrect.

There were also directories that seemed duplicative, such as /full/variable/ and /full/variable-ttf/, and /unhinted/variable/and /unhinted/variable-ttf/.

simoncozens commented 7 months ago

Because of the way the Duployan fonts are created - which is way different from the standard build process; they don't have UFO or Glyphs sources - we do not provide full (i.e. including a Latin) builds of these fonts. So no, they should not be in a full directory. If you really want a "full" build, the googlefonts directory contains versions with a merged Latin.

BPickle commented 7 months ago

My apologies for not noticing that the fonts in question did not include Latin characters.