Closed girish-dalvi closed 1 year ago
Thank you for this. It looks generally OK, although the original Kaithi proposal notes that ka + vocalic r does not attach to the the stem but forms a ligature:
See also other examples in the vocalic r proposal:
However, I notice that the "normal" form of ka + attached vocalic r does seem to also exist in the proposal, if I am reading it right (although the scan is not very clear):
I feel like we may need a ligature ktKVSRA here.
There's also a missing space in the feature code, but obviously I can fix that:
--- a/sources/NotoSansKaithi.glyphs
+++ b/sources/NotoSansKaithi.glyphs
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ code = "ktBHa.half ktBa.half ktCHa.half ktCa.half ktDDDHa.half ktDDHa.half ktDDa
name = class16;
},
{
-code = "ktVSCBindu ktVSAnusvara ktVSE ktVSRktVSAI ktVSAIm ktVSEm ktRaHook ktRaAnusvara ktRaCandrabindu\012";
+code = "ktVSCBindu ktVSAnusvara ktVSE ktVSR ktVSAI ktVSAIm ktVSEm ktRaHook ktRaAnusvara ktRaCandrabindu\012";
name = markAttachmentSet11;
},
{
Hi Simon,
We have updated the file with ligatures for Ka+vocalicR, Ha+vocalicR and alternate form of Ka+vocalicR.
Thank you so much!
– Added glyph ktVSR (U+110C2) and anchors. – In ktYa, KtVa changed position of Nukta to avoid clashing with ktVSR – In ktYa, corrected placement of anchor