The sans interrobang (U+203D) in Noto Sans looks...bad. It looks like a deformed letter P to me. The serif interrobang in Noto Serif looks fine. But even worse, U+1F67A (sans-serif interrobang ornament) from "Noto Sans Symbols 2" has a great looking interrobang!
In fact, U+203D is the odd one out among all the interrobangs. Out of all four interrobangs (U+203D, U+1F67A, U+1F679, U+1F67B), the first one (U-203D) is the only one where the exclamation point joins the top of the question mark.
I propose that the interrobang design from U+1F67A should replace the one in Noto Sans (U+203D). Doing this would also remove the strange discrepancy of two different interrobang designs.
This would also have to apply to the inverted interrobang (U+2E18).
Character data
U+203D ‽
U+1F67A 🙺
U+1F679 🙹
U+1F67B 🙻
U+2E18 ⸘
Screenshot
EDIT:
To show this even more clearly, here's U+203D in the Black weight. The strangeness of the sans version is even more apparent.
And while I'm on this topic, the exclamation points in U+203D (sans version only), U1F67A, U+1F67B, and U+2E18 look off center. U+1F679 and U+203D (serif version only) are the only ones that look correctly centered.
Font
NotoSans[wdth,wght].ttf
Where the font came from, and when
https://github.com/notofonts/latin-greek-cyrillic/releases
Font Version
Noto Sans 2.013
OS name and version
Windows 11
Application name and version
Everything
Issue
The sans interrobang (U+203D) in Noto Sans looks...bad. It looks like a deformed letter P to me. The serif interrobang in Noto Serif looks fine. But even worse, U+1F67A (sans-serif interrobang ornament) from "Noto Sans Symbols 2" has a great looking interrobang!
In fact, U+203D is the odd one out among all the interrobangs. Out of all four interrobangs (U+203D, U+1F67A, U+1F679, U+1F67B), the first one (U-203D) is the only one where the exclamation point joins the top of the question mark.
I propose that the interrobang design from U+1F67A should replace the one in Noto Sans (U+203D). Doing this would also remove the strange discrepancy of two different interrobang designs.
This would also have to apply to the inverted interrobang (U+2E18).
Character data
U+203D ‽ U+1F67A 🙺 U+1F679 🙹 U+1F67B 🙻 U+2E18 ⸘
Screenshot
EDIT: To show this even more clearly, here's U+203D in the Black weight. The strangeness of the sans version is even more apparent.