Closed dscorbett closed 1 year ago
I don't know where this UVS idea came from but it obviously came from somewhere, so I've disabled it for now (and removed the glyphs from exporting to the final TTF) rather than deleting it from the font sources. The ccmp
substitutions contained this:
sub setminus VS1 by setminus.uv001;
sub setminus VS1 by setminus.uv001.ssty1;
sub setminus VS1 by setminus.uv001.ssty2;
which is clearly wrong.
Font
NotoSansMath-Regular.otf
Where the font came from, and when
Site: https://github.com/notofonts/math/releases/tag/NotoSansMath-v2.539 Date: 2023-03-18
Font version
Version 2.539
Issue
<U+2216, U+FE00> looks different from U+2216, but that sequence is not a standardized variation sequence. U+FE00 should have no effect in that context.
Character data
∖︀∖ U+2216 SET MINUS U+FE00 VARIATION SELECTOR-1 U+2216 SET MINUS
Screenshot