Closed dscorbett closed 1 year ago
... and they should be different
On my Mac using default font their sizes seem to be different (at least for the first three pairs);
per MT fixed
This should not have been closed: U+2AF4 and U+2AFC still look identical.
This is fixed with #33.
Font
NotoSansMath-Regular.ttf
Where the font came from, and when
Site: https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-fonts/blob/c30307083469f0c05e216ac75216fd454a517858/hinted/NotoSansMath-Regular.ttf Date: 2019-02-04
Font version
Version 2.000
Issue
The n-ary operators U+2A01, U+2A02, U+2A00, and U+2AFC look the same as their binary counterparts U+2295, U+2297, U+2299, and U+2AF4.
Character data
⊕⨁ U+2295 CIRCLED PLUS U+2A01 N-ARY CIRCLED PLUS OPERATOR ⊗⨂ U+2297 CIRCLED TIMES U+2A02 N-ARY CIRCLED TIMES OPERATOR ⊙⨀ U+2299 CIRCLED DOT OPERATOR U+2A00 N-ARY CIRCLED DOT OPERATOR ⫴⫼ U+2AF4 TRIPLE VERTICAL BAR BINARY RELATION U+2AFC LARGE TRIPLE VERTICAL BAR OPERATOR
Screenshot