search

notofonts / noto-cjk

Noto CJK fonts
http://www.google.com/get/noto/help/cjk
2.94k stars 215 forks source link

Any plans for GB18030-2022 Level2 Compliance? #239

Closed JaGGeR101 closed 1 year ago

JaGGeR101 commented 1 year ago

Hi,

I found this project from a link by Dr. Ken Lunde regarding GB18030-2022. There is a claim that this project is at least level 2 compliant due to foresightedness. As we are getting closer to the actual implementation of the standard, there are some minor issues that has been found -- missing characters :

format: gb18030-2022 code (unicode) 0x9839e137 (U+2b9d3) 0x9932d438 (U+2c816) 0x9934b536 (U+2d0b6) 0x99388137 (U+2e25f) 0x9939b336 (U+2e93e)

Any plans on an update?

punchcutter commented 1 year ago

Where do you see that those characters are part of Level 2?

JaGGeR101 commented 1 year ago

Sorry for the delayed response. Had to confirm some things about this. The characters came from a test file for the 196 characters for level 2. The test file is from CESI (China Electronic Standardization Institute).

punchcutter commented 1 year ago

Those aren't in the 196 glyphs, but these five are if there's no typo in the code:

0x9839E137 -> 0x9838E137 U+2B4E7 𫓧 0x9932D438 -> 0x9933D438 U+2CD02 𬴂 0x9934B536 -> 0x9834B536 U+29F7E 𩽾 0x99388137 -> 0x98388137 U+2B127 𫄧 0x9939B336 -> 0x9839B336 U+2B806 𫠆

punchcutter commented 1 year ago

So that test file seems buggy.

punchcutter commented 1 year ago

CESI confirmed the test file is wrong so closing this issue. Thanks for finding the bug!