Closed YanAnzouyijun closed 10 months ago
medicalwei
commented
1 year ago The same article from Dr. Ken Lunde suggests that it is just removed from the standard, but no requirement to remove the glyphs.
I would like to confirm it is not a requirement from GB 18030-2022 to remove these 9 glyphs from the fonts to be standard-compliant.
chihchun
commented
1 year ago Based on L2/22-274R: Disruptive Changes in GB 18030-2022,
punchcutter
commented
1 year ago We are not removing the glyphs or any encodings.
punchcutter
commented
10 months ago When the GB 18030 2022 amendment is finalized we can look at everything again, but until then we can close this.
Defect Report
GB 18030-2022 has delete nine CJK Compatibility Ideographs are no longer required. but noto-cjk still has two unicode, noto-cjk did not delete old unicode.
Title
GB 18030-2022 has delete nine CJK Compatibility Ideographs are no longer required. but noto-cjk still has two unicode. noto-cjk did not delete old unicode.
Font
r Noto Sans CJK
GB 18030-2022 has delete old unicode in GB18030-2005: such as 郎 (0xFD9C) in GB18030-2005 is U+F92C, and in GB18030-2022 is U+90DE . but i had found a paper written by Dr. Ken Lunde regarding GB18030-2022: https://ken-lunde.medium.com/the-gb-18030-2022-standard-3d0ebaeb4132. he said that "Of course, there is no requirement for font implementations to remove these nine CJK Compatibility Ideographs. There is simply no longer a requirement to include them. I suspect that most font implementations will leave the glyphs and their mappings in place for the sake of backward compatibility".
a staff member in Standardization Institute said the font must delete old unicode ,otherwise Level 2 will not pass.