Closed Mercury13 closed 2 years ago
The problem is due to the ordering of features. blwm
contains the mark-to-mark positioning rules but this is being run before mark
which contains the mark-to-base positioning rules. So the two below marks are first being correctly positioned relative to each other, and then erroneously attached to the same base glyph. Giving these features an explicit ordering seems to fix it.
Defect Report
Title
Tibetan 0F77 and 0F79 are garbled
(they are banned and should not exist in actual text, but is it possible to showcase them somehow?)
Font
NotoSerifTibetan-Regular.ttf
Where the font came from, and when
Site: this repo Date: 2022-04-07
Font Version
2.101
OS name and version
Win10 21H1
Application name and version
Qt 6.1.2, probably all OS
Issue
Character data
25CC Dotted circle 0F77 Tibetan vowel sign Vocalic Rr
25CC Dotted circle 0F79 Tibetan vowel sign Vocalic Ll
Screenshot