Open xiangyexiao opened 7 years ago
Ahh, you'll notice that in the output notodiff reports large differences in glyph coverage. This is incorrect, but notodiff can't tell because the glyphs are inconsistently named.
I've encountered this before, and my idea to fix it is to match glyphs by their calculated harfbuzz input rather than by their names. I just haven't gotten around to it yet.
I used notodiff to compare two versions of NotoSansMayanmar. See Archive.zip
It only reports a single glyph difference uni25CC.png, while fontdiff shows the two versions have a lot of differences. Check fontdiff report in NotoSansMyanmar-Bold.pdf.
From my eyes, it is also obvious one font is bolder than the other. Something must be wrong in notodiff to detect the wide differences.
NotoSansMyanmar-Bold.pdf
Archive.zip