Closed dscorbett closed 5 years ago
@dscorbett : my reading of what's coming in Unicode that this is a designer choice (and Unicode will be changed) hence I'm closing this one
@dscorbett : Looks that for some Tibetan fonts which came from China's Tibetan Research Center the following are the same (so we might need to further revise Unicode spec): U+0F0E TIBETAN MARK NYIS SHAD two adjacent U+0F0D TIBETAN MARK SHADs single U+0F0D TIBETAN MARK SHAD
My gut feeling is that there shouldn't be a spec regarding the distance between SHADs
see the following
Font
NotoSansTibetan-Regular.ttf
Where the font came from, and when
Site: https://noto-website-2.storage.googleapis.com/pkgs/NotoSansTibetan-unhinted.zip Date: 2018-03-21
Font version
Version 1.01 uh
Issue
U+0F0E TIBETAN MARK NYIS SHAD is slightly narrower than two adjacent U+0F0D TIBETAN MARK SHADs, but The Unicode Standard says that U+0F0E should be wider, or at least not narrower. However, many Tibetan fonts, including some made by people who know Tibetan, do make U+0F0E narrower. It is not clear what to do, but as long as you’re redesigning Noto Sans Tibetan, you should be aware of the issue.
Character data
༎།། U+0F0E TIBETAN MARK NYIS SHAD U+0F0D TIBETAN MARK SHAD U+0F0D TIBETAN MARK SHAD
Screenshot