search

nottinghamtec / Main-Website

TEC's public facing website
https://www.nottinghamtec.co.uk/
4 stars 5 forks source link

Move to Jekyll #69

Closed harry-bridge closed 3 years ago

harry-bridge commented 7 years ago

As has become apparent recently HUGO isn't stable for us going forward so @tomtom5152 and I think that switching over to Jekyll will be better for us in the long run, it won't be that much effort and could open up more possibilities in the future that we can't do with HUGO

davidtaylorhq commented 7 years ago

@pickleshb Many efforts, but I agree. Why did we even go for Hugo in the first place?

harry-bridge commented 7 years ago

@davidtaylorhq blame @tomtom51512

tomtom5152 commented 7 years ago

@davidtaylorhq That was entirely my choice, based on no experience, I now think jekyll is the better platform. As Harry said, it won't be that much effort, maybe just changing some of the variables and syntax in the templates, and rewriting the committee page logic (not difficult)

davidtaylorhq commented 7 years ago

@tomtom5152 Fair enough - wasn't trying to be rude about the choice, just interested. Do they use the same template syntax?

harry-bridge commented 7 years ago

@tomtom5152 I'll probably have a bash at the end of exams

FreneticScribbler commented 4 years ago

Intresting that Bootstrap have just switched the other way. Going to take a look at sticking with Hugo (no arguments with Ruby is a massive plus to me...)

FreneticScribbler commented 3 years ago

Go good, Ruby bad