Closed fullofcaffeine closed 5 years ago
Hi coffee junkie ;-)
I see the source for your confusion.
Please do read https://github.com/novoid/Memacs#the-basics
In the FAQs https://github.com/novoid/Memacs/blob/master/docs/FAQs_and_Best_Practices.org#file-names-of-generated-memacs-files-archive I am trying to explain the reason why you most likely don't want to generate Twitter.org
but Twitter.org_archive
instead.
Archiving is a standard feature of Org mode: https://orgmode.org/manual/Moving-subtrees.html#Moving-subtrees
This way, you can keep your .org
files small and clean: moving content to .org_archive
files offers the possibility to keep the content somewhere but it doesn't interfere with your daily tasks or agenda. With a decent number of headings in your Memacs files, you will end up having performance issues as described in the FAQs. As a consequence, I recommend generating content into archive files. In order to see this content in your agenda, you then need more or less empty files without the _archive
extension which I called stub files.
Does this now make more sense to you?
First of all, thanks for Memacs! I've been using it for Twitter favorites (adapting the original Twitter module, inheriting from the same
Memacs
base class) and it has been working great so far. I might share the module after I figure out the following:The generated file (the
-o
option when calling the module from the CLI), has the following in header text:I'm confused though. First, when calling my module, I call it the following way:
That text seems to imply that the generated file is the archive file, why? Also I can't find any correspondent auto-generated
Twitter.org_archive
file. Also, what is the "stub" file and what is it supposed to contain? I also don't see the correspondentarchive
file anywhere.Am I missing something?
Thanks in advance!