search

nowa / carrierwave-upyun

UpYun storage for CarrierWave
161 stars 27 forks source link

上传过去太慢了 #13

Closed huacnlee closed 12 years ago

huacnlee commented 12 years ago

加上本地图片裁剪，基本上都要 3s 一个...

3张图片

大的 118K 中图 118K 小图 26K

一共耗费时间: 3139ms

盛大云的服务器过去

huacnlee commented 12 years ago

参见这个测试例子

我在盛大云的 VPS 上面跑测试出来结果:

puts Benchmark.measure {
  @photo = Photo.create(:image => f)
}

0.120000   0.140000   0.590000 (  1.979279)

1.9s - 2.1s 之间

huacnlee commented 12 years ago

我又尝试去掉图片处理的代码, 现在没有任何裁剪的

0.070000   0.030000   0.100000 (  0.753590)

需要 700ms

huacnlee commented 12 years ago

Ping 的情况也正常

64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=45.0 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=114 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=11.4 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=18.2 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=11.0 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=10.9 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=7 ttl=54 time=18.9 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=8 ttl=54 time=15.4 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=9 ttl=54 time=11.0 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=10 ttl=54 time=11.1 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=11 ttl=54 time=10.9 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=12 ttl=54 time=13.5 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=13 ttl=54 time=10.8 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=14 ttl=54 time=32.7 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=15 ttl=54 time=10.9 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=16 ttl=54 time=10.9 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=17 ttl=54 time=10.9 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=18 ttl=54 time=11.0 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=19 ttl=54 time=16.4 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=20 ttl=54 time=11.2 ms
64 bytes from 60.191.100.98: icmp_seq=21 ttl=54 time=23.7 ms
huacnlee commented 12 years ago

最后我测试发现是盛大云上传带宽的问题: http://ruby-china.org/topics/5059

nowa commented 12 years ago

还是得尽量不自己缩略图。这个问题我先关闭了哈。