search

nowknowing / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

DG: Missing End command implementation #11

Open nowknowing opened 3 years ago

nowknowing commented 3 years ago

Unable to find information on the implementation/explanation etc to End command, apart from in Instruction to manual testing

nus-pe-bot commented 3 years ago

Team's Response

We could have included the implementation details for the end command, but we felt that it was highly unnecessary.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

Reason for disagreement: It is a requirement to include in the DG, implementations of v1.4 image.png

Additionally, it is very difficult to claim that implementations details for the End command is unnecessary. The End command functions in a way very different from any of the (explained) commands in the product; it is definitely new and different from AB3 and critical. It is also definitely a feature, as supported by the fact that it is the very first command explained in the UG.

:question: Issue severity

Team chose [severity.Low] Originally [severity.High]

Reason for disagreement: Makes the DG unusable to the reader looking for any bit of explanation about the End implementation, thus is of High Severity. If such exclusions of critical implementations are allowed, or considered any lower than of High Severity, it will not make sense to all the other groups that had every critical implementation of their product added to the DG (and then often exposing themselves to other actual DG bugs).