Currently, the type-checking tries to work his way up the interface's
inheritance tree to resolve the scope of an item.
It then selects the first one to match, instead of going on to check whether it
could be an ambiguous declaration.
Since we chose to be strict on these aspects, we should not resolve but output
an error telling it's ambiguous, with the prospects for the resolution, to help
fix the issue.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by dav.pineau@gmail.com on 3 Mar 2012 at 12:56
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dav.pineau@gmail.com
on 3 Mar 2012 at 12:56