Closed usr110 closed 8 years ago
I realise that in the 'order lines/flows by' menu, "Level of cycling" is ambiguous. Could this be clarified to either "Number of cyclists" or "Level of cycling (%)" (I'm not sure which it is)
I believe it is Number of cyclists
from @AnnaGoodman1
1) I realise that on the option menu in PCT the header "N. Lines (most cycled)" is not always correct. Only in the census 2011 scenario does will always see the lines ranked by number of cyclists. If you have chosen to order the lines by carbon reductions, then the "(most cycled)" part is wrong. If the label could be different for different scenarios them one could have: Census 2011 "N. Lines (most cycled)" > "Top N Lines (most cycled)" Scenarios "N. Lines (most cycled)" > "Top N Lines"
Can this be done easily? Or you have a different suggestion? E.g. perhaps we could have "N. Lines (most cycled)" > "Top N Lines" and then a tooltip?
2) I realise that in the 'order lines/flows by' menu, "Level of cycling" is ambiguous. Could this be clarified to either "Number of cyclists" or "Level of cycling (%)" (I'm not sure which it is)
3) could a tooltip that pops up when you hover over 'Scenario' be change from "Scenario (see FAQ tab)" to "Scenario (see Manual)"
4) could the tool tooltip that pops up over the number slide option change from "Flows to show" to "Number of lines to show"