npm / node-semver

The semver parser for node (the one npm uses)
ISC License
5.06k stars 492 forks source link

[QUESTION] `semver.intersects('>=16.0.0 <17.0.0', '^17.0.0-0', { includePrereleases: true })` should be `false` #345

Open ljharb opened 3 years ago

ljharb commented 3 years ago

What / Why

semver.intersects('>=16.0.0 <17.0.0', '^17.0.0-0') should be true, and is.

semver.intersects('>=16.0.0 <17.0.0', '^17.0.0-0', { includePrereleases: true }) should be false, and is not.

I made test cases:

diff --git a/test/classes/range.js b/test/classes/range.js
index e3867a9..bf77331 100644
--- a/test/classes/range.js
+++ b/test/classes/range.js
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ test('tostrings', (t) => {
 })

 test('ranges intersect', (t) => {
-  rangeIntersection.forEach(([r0, r1, expect]) => {
+  rangeIntersection.forEach(([r0, r1, expect, includePrerelease]) => {
     t.test(`${r0} <~> ${r1}`, t => {
       const range0 = new Range(r0)
       const range1 = new Range(r1)
@@ -92,6 +92,14 @@ test('ranges intersect', (t) => {
         `${r0} <~> ${r1} objects`)
       t.equal(range1.intersects(range0), expect,
         `${r1} <~> ${r0} objects`)
+
+      if (includePrerelease) {
+        t.equal(range0.intersects(range1, { includePrerelease: true }), expect,
+          `${r0} <~> ${r1} objects`)
+        t.equal(range1.intersects(range0, { includePrerelease: true }), expect,
+          `${r1} <~> ${r0} objects`)
+      }
+
       t.end()
     })
   })
diff --git a/test/fixtures/range-intersection.js b/test/fixtures/range-intersection.js
index e46c82a..956de82 100644
--- a/test/fixtures/range-intersection.js
+++ b/test/fixtures/range-intersection.js
@@ -53,5 +53,7 @@ module.exports = [
   ['1.3.0 || <1.0.0 >2.0.0', 'x', true],
   ['1.x', '1.3.0 || <1.0.0 >2.0.0', true],
   ['*', '*', true],
-  ['x', '', true]
+  ['x', '', true],
+  ['>=16.0.0 <17.0.0', '^17.0.0-0', false],
+  ['>=16.0.0 <17.0.0', '^17.0.0-0', true, true],
 ]
diff --git a/test/ranges/intersects.js b/test/ranges/intersects.js
index e93492b..1545420 100644
--- a/test/ranges/intersects.js
+++ b/test/ranges/intersects.js
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ test('intersect comparators', t => {
 })

 test('ranges intersect', (t) => {
-  rangeIntersection.forEach(([r0, r1, expect]) => {
+  rangeIntersection.forEach(([r0, r1, expect, includePrerelease]) => {
     t.test(`${r0} <~> ${r1}`, t => {
       const range0 = new Range(r0)
       const range1 = new Range(r1)
@@ -43,6 +43,20 @@ test('ranges intersect', (t) => {
         `${r0} <~> ${r1} objects loose`)
       t.equal(intersects(range1, range0, true), expect,
         `${r1} <~> ${r0} objects loose`)
+
+      if (includePrerelease) {
+        t.equal(intersects(r1, r0, { includePrerelease: true }), expect, `${r0} <~> ${r1}`)
+        t.equal(intersects(r0, r1, { includePrerelease: true }), expect, `${r1} <~> ${r0}`)
+        t.equal(intersects(r1, r0, { loose: true, includePrerelease: true }), expect, `${r0} <~> ${r1} loose`)
+        t.equal(intersects(r0, r1, { loose: true, includePrerelease: true }), expect, `${r1} <~> ${r0} loose`)
+        t.equal(intersects(range0, range1, { includePrerelease: true }), expect, `${r0} <~> ${r1} objects`)
+        t.equal(intersects(range1, range0, { includePrerelease: true }), expect, `${r1} <~> ${r0} objects`)
+        t.equal(intersects(range0, range1, { loose: true, includePrerelease: true }), expect,
+          `${r0} <~> ${r1} objects loose`)
+        t.equal(intersects(range1, range0, { loose: true, includePrerelease: true }), expect,
+          `${r1} <~> ${r0} objects loose`)
+      }
+
       t.end()
     })
   })

but i can't figure out how to fix it.

isaacs commented 3 years ago

Hm, I disagree with the stated intent here.

semver.intersects('>1.0.0 <2.0.0', '^2.0.0-0', {includePrerelease: false}) should be false. There is no version that satisfies both ranges, because 2.0.0-0 is not included by <2.0.0 if includePrerelease is not enabled.

semver.intersects('>1.0.0 <2.0.0', '^2.0.0-0', {includePrerelease: true}) should be true. 2.0.0-0 is included by both ranges in includePrerelease mode.

ljharb commented 3 years ago

Ah ok, I can swap them - that makes sense to me, I just misunderstood our slack discussion. I just need it to be true with one of the options :-)

Updated.

lukekarrys commented 1 year ago

Action Item:

kiarza2543 commented 12 months ago

i need jonh addmin web