search

npm / rfcs

Public change requests/proposals & ideation
Other
730 stars 239 forks source link

Open RFC Meeting - Wednesday, November 25, 2020, 2:00 PM EST #293

Closed darcyclarke closed 3 years ago

darcyclarke commented 3 years ago

Why?

In our ongoing efforts to better listen to & collaborate with the community, we've started an Open RFC call that helps to move conversations & initiatives forward.

When?

Wednesday, November 25, 2020, 2:00 PM EST

Cadence: This meeting is scheduled to take place bi-weekly. Previous meeting agendas and notes can be found here

Add to your Calendar: You follow this & find other npm events by using our public events calendar

What?

All discussions surrounding RFCs are covered by the npm Code of Conduct. Please keep conversations constructive, civil & be mindful of when others are speaking. As is tradition, "raise your hand" when requesting to comment on a topic or request to comment asynchronously within the chat. The npm team may, at its own discretion, moderate, mute &/or remove a person from an Open RFC call for any reason.

Agenda

  1. Housekeeping
    1. Introduction(s)
    2. Code of Conduct Acknowledgement
    3. Outline Intentions & Desired Outcomes
    4. Announcements
  2. Issue: #287 [RRFC] Add nohoist option for workspaces - @socialwyze-franklin
  3. PR: #279 RFC for --default-command - @isaacs
  4. Issue: #275 [RRFC] `registry:<url>:<name>[@<version-range>]` dependency specifier - @isaacs
  5. PR: #273 RFC: npm workspaces - Config management - @ruyadorno
  6. PR: #272 RFC: add preferDev field to package.json - @Ginden
  7. PR: #217 RFC: add registry per package per organisation - @baloran

How?

Join Zoom Meeting https://npm.zoom.us/j/584504445

Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 646 558 8656 US (New York)

Meeting ID: 584 504 445 Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/abR8OFljr8

Watch the livestream https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCK71Wk0I45SLTSXQA23GdIw/videos

Invitees

Please use the following emoji reactions to indicate your availability.

darcyclarke commented 3 years ago
ljharb commented 3 years ago

Was there a resolution on #279 or #272?