nrdxp / rfc-evidence

8 stars 1 forks source link

Haven't read the entire thing but ... #1

Open asdf8dfafjk opened 6 months ago

asdf8dfafjk commented 6 months ago

...

1) grahamc is a drama queen and should probably be ousted anyway.

2) Can we agree that the first people we need to kick out are the ones who use , before the list of arguments and not after? People just blindly copy haskell style not thinking if aids readability. I want arguments to a function to start at next indentation level.

On a serious note, (and I do agree that leftists are authoritarians, your document is too long so there should be some kind of "intended readership" thing and also just ignore those rabble rousers, mulligan has always come across as a bit weird anyway

nrdxp commented 6 months ago

I'm am not against humor, and I find it no small part of the problem that we, apparently, are not allowed to make light of difficult situations and just laugh at ourselves once in a while.

That said, I'd really appreciate if we don't turn this repository into a meme graveyard as well. However, if you want to take part in the discussion, which is apparently disallowed from taking place here (even though we were told many times to write an RFC), please feel free to join us on matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#rfc-175-all-together:matrix.org